The Affordable Care Act: Obligations of Large Employers

Which Employers Are Covered?

Beginning January 1, 2014, employers with at least 50 full-time employees or a combination of full-time and part-time employees equivalent to at least 50 full-time employees, e.g., 100 half­time employees, will be subject to the Employer Shared Responsibility provisions under the Affordable Care Act. A full-time employee is one who works on average at least 30 hours per week.  A half-time employee is one who works at least 15 hours per week.

In determining whether an employer is subject to the Employer Share Responsibility requirements on January 1, 2014, the IRS will look to employment during 2013.  Employers whose number of employees fluctuates throughout the year will use averages to determine whether they will fall within the definition of Applicable Large Employer.  The proposed regulations provide additional information about how to determine the average number of employees for a year, including information about how to take account of salaried employees who may not clock their hours and a special rule for seasonal workers.

It is not uncommon for a small employer to own more than one company.  The IRS has long treated certain companies under common ownership as one company in determining application of certain rules and regulations.  The same approach will apply with the Employer Shared Responsibility Provisions.  For example, if Joan Smith owns both the ABC Widget Company and the XYZ Widget Installation Company, each with 25 employees, it is possible that the companies will be treated as one and both will be subject to the new regulations.

What Is the Employer Shared Responsibility Requirement?

The Employer Share Responsibility obligation requires an employer to make payments to the IRS if it fails to comply with the mandates of the Act.  This particular provision of the Act falls within the Internal Revenue Code.

Covered employers who do not offer affordable health coverage that provides a minimum level of coverage to their full-time employees may be subject to Employer Shared Responsibility payments if at least one of their full-time employees receives a premium tax credit for purchasing individual coverage on one of the new Affordable Insurance Exchanges.

How Do Employers Comply and Avoid the Shared Responsibility Payment?

A covered employer will not be subject to an Employer Shared Responsibility payment if the employer offers affordable health coverage that provides a minimum level of coverage to its full-time employees.

An employer is liable for the payment only if

  • The employer does not offer health coverage at all or offers coverage to less than 95% of its full-time employees, and at least one of the full-time employees receives a premium tax credit to help pay for coverage on an Insurance Exchange; or
  • The employer offers health coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees, but at least one full-time employee receives a premium tax credit to help pay for coverage on an Exchange, because the coverage the employer offered that employee was either unaffordable to the employee or did not provide minimum value.

Premium Tax Credits are provide to help pay for coverage for employees of limited means.  Credits are available to employees

  • Whose family income is between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level and who enroll in coverage through an Affordable Insurance Exchange.  (The federal poverty level for 2012 for a family of four was $23,050, meaning that any employee whose family income for a family of four was between $23,050 and $92,200, who enrolls in coverage in an Affordable Insurance Exchange, would be eligible for the Credits.)
  • Who are not eligible for coverage through a government-sponsored program like Medicaid or CHIP, and
  • Who are not eligible for coverage offered by an employer or are eligible only for employer coverage that is unaffordable or that does not provide minimum value.

Determining Whether Coverage Is Affordable

If an employee’s share of the premium for employer-provided healthcare coverage for the employee lone (as opposed to family coverage) would cost the employee more than 9.5% of that employee’s annual household income, the coverage is not considered affordable for that employee. If an employer offers more than one healthcare coverage option, the affordability test applies to the lowest-cost option available to the employee that also meets the established minimum value requirement.  For example, if the employee’s annual household income were $50,054, the median family income as of 2011, the premium paid by the employee could not exceed $4755.

Recognizing that employers are not likely to know the household income for each of their employees, the regulations provide some safe harbors.  The first safe harbor provides that the plan is deemed affordable if the cost to the employee of self-only coverage does not exceed 9.5% of the W-2 wages paid by the employer to the employee during the relevant year.

In determining whether the plan meets the minimum value standards, employers may use an actuarial value calculator which the Department of Health and Human Services has made available.  To meet the minimum value criteria, the plan must cover at least 60% of the total allowed cost of benefits expected to be incurred under the plan.

How is the Employer Shared Responsibility Payment Determined?

If a covered employer does not offer coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees, and at least one full-time employee receives the premium tax credit, the employer will owe an Employer Shared Responsibility payment equal to the number of full-time employees the employer employed for the year (minus 30) multiplied by $2,000.  For purposes of calculating the payment, only full-time employees are counted, not full time equivalents.

For an employer that actually offers coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees in 2014, but has one or more full-time employees who receive a premium tax credit, the payment will be computed separately for each month. The amount of the payment for the month will be the number of full-time employees who receive a premium tax credit for that month multiplied by 1/12 of $3,000. The amount of the payment for any calendar month will be capped at the number of the employer’s full-time employees for the month (minus up to 30) multiplied by 1/12 of $2,000.  This cap ensures that an employer that offers coverage will never owe more than an employer who does not offer coverage.

Conclusion

There are a number of variables that may impact final decisions of employers.  Among those are (i) whether Congress modifies current tax law to tax the value of health insurance benefits; (ii) whether high deductible plans and other options which are less expensive than traditional healthcare will meet the affordability and value criteria of the law; and (iii) what new insurance options will be available in 2014 in light of the requirements of the new law.

A New Day for HealthCare: The Affordable Care Act

Since its passage a few years ago, Republicans and others have sought to demonize the Affordable Care Act, while conversely those supporting the Act have done a poor job of providing accurate information about the Act.  I have found this political contest a quagmire of misinformation.

Like most ground breaking legislation, the Act is not without its flaws, and over time hopefully legislators will set aside politics and take steps to improve the legislation as needed.  As we experience the implementation of the statute, we will doubtless find new issues to be addressed.  However, given the fact that we pay more for healthcare in the United States and get less satisfactory results than many other industrialized nations, the fact that millions of American until this time have been without healthcare, while those of us with coverage have paid higher premiums to subsidize many of them, and a number of other factors, the fact we have at last done something is encouraging.

So here I begin a series of posts on the Affordable Health Care Act trying to provide information regarding new regulations and most importantly how the Act will affect employers and employees.